1. Yes, I am agree with the Plato's objection to freedom of expression and artistic liberty enjoyed by creative writer. There is so many movies which should be banned according to the Plato 's objection like Grand Masti One Night Stand Murder ,etc. All this film should be banned according to the Plato's objection .
There is some advertisement which should be banned according to the Plato's law of objection.
As we know that there is so many films or TV shops which are bad for the minor .May they take it personally ,there is so many creative serials that children can try and that is not good for them.
2. In B.A. programme there is a novel Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde .Which is written by R L Stevenson that we can consider as a creative work .That 's follows the Aristotelian's literary tradition .But people can imitate him but that is not good .Or we can say that if we want to live the life freely than it is good.
3. During B.A. i studied the tragic play" OTHELLO " which is written by Shakespeare.Othello himself is the protagonist of the play.The Hamartia of the play is there is a tragic flaw in the play and there is a error of the judgement in the end of the play by the hero.Which leads him to the death of his lover and also he himself commit suicide.
4.Yes, these tragedies are follows the rules and regulation proposed by Aristotle. Like a chain of cause and effect ,principle of probability and necessity ,harmonious arrangement of incident ,complete certain magnitude ,unity of action .
If we conclude this topic we can say that they both are right at it's own way .It depends on us to which way we choose .If we want to live the life of morality than Plato is right .If we want to live a freedomful life than Aristotle is right .But if we think rationally than Aristotle is somehow better than his guru because most people like to enjoy the life and also to live a creative life .
So it is very good knowledge of poetics as a form of literature.
On the 71st Independence Day, I attended the Flag Hoisting Ceremony at the main administrative building of MKBU. Dr. Zala, who has hoisted the flag, gave information about our freedom fighters and also remembered our soldiers who are on the border for our safety.
After this ceremony, I attended the screening of the thrilling movie Rang de Basanti. Which was arranged at the English Department. I just became mesmerized after watching this film. First, I would like to introduce the whole team for the movie.
Director :Rakeysh Omprakash Mehra
Writer :Prasoon Joshi
Release Date: 26 January 2006
Language:Hindi ,Punjabi,English
Amir Khan is a DJ, and Chandrashekhar Azad is an actor.
First, I would like to tell you about the meaning of the film's title, Rang de Basanti: Color of Sacrifice. Another meaning is 'Rang de Mohe'.
The movie starts with a British lady named Sue coming to India to find actors who can act in her documentary film. The documentary, or we can say diary, is of her grandfather, who was the jailer of the jail where Bhagatsingh, Sukhdev,Sukhdev and many more were imprisoned. The main theme of the film is the independence movement of that time and how today's youth are concerned with the sacrifice of freedom fighters.
Sue stays with Sonia at college. There she takes the auditions of the students, but no one can feets in the character. After passing some time by chance, she finds all those courageous freedom fighter images in Sonia's friends (DJs Karan, Sukhi, and Aslam) . So she meets all these friends, and they are all busy dancing, drinking, racing,Racing and other unproductive activities. She goes to a party with them. While they are all enjoying the party at that time, Laxman Pandey comes with his party's members and tells them to stop doing this all-western activity. They all fight against each other, and at that time, the police come and try to catch them all, but DJ gives money to the police, and the police leave. Another thing about the film is that there is a story in the story. Initially, we see friends who are not at all familiar with the sacrifice of the freedom fighter. May be they know about them, but they don't want to live that life, or they have just not at all mind about the situation in the country. But while doing that, their souls start changing, and they start living a life like freedom fighters. The other story stratifies in the story. Lt. Ajay Rathod dies because of the defective parts of the plane. He is a friend of theirs and a fiancé of Sonia. They all come to know that behind all this, the defense minister and a businessman are involved in this crime. The interesting thing is that a businessman is the father of Karan.
At the end of the film, they go to India Gate with the candle march for the justice of their friend. But they are all beat by police. Finally, they all become violent as they all act in the story of Bhagatsingh, Rajguru,and Chandrashekhar Azad. They planned to kill the defense minister. They become successful in the plan. But they don't want to run away, and they themselves go to Radio Akashvani and accept that they have killed the defense minister. After that announcement, we learned that Karan also killed his father, and they were all encountered by Black Cat Commando. Yet we see them all happy while they are dying, as mentioned above, as freedom fighters.
Main points of the film:
The narrative technique of the movie is story within story.
Youth of India.
Courageous mother.
Women also join in the movement.
Corruption.
An outsider comes and teaches us.
Outsiders were mesmerized after seeing the style of corruption, which is normal for us.
Police of the country.
Mythical use of character (Bhagatsingh, Chandrashekhar Azad, etc.)
Politicians and businessmen have a relationship.
Use of true events.
For them, kranti means violence.
Hindu-Muslim relation.
to fit the defective part. (all my sons).
use of public places for showing feelings. (In today's time, social media)
So we can say that there is still corruption. One more thing is that people are beat by their own protectors. It is a very good idea for a director to portray the history of our freedom fighters, today's youth's evils, or the relation between politicians and the corporate world. Patriotism is also there. One more thing about the film is that it was controversial because, as we know, the famous proverb 'Truth is always bitter'. In that sense, MiG, the defense field, politicians, and political parties were the obstacles to releasing the film, but yet it was released and got a very good response. So I can say it was worth to watch.It is also very informative.
On 8th August in The Department of English there was a screening of the play Digdarshak.Which was arranged by my senior Alpa Ponda and her team who is the head of the screening committee.First i want to say about the play .The play is about the Theatre life and Cinema life.There is only two character in the play Father and son .The play moves ahead with the flash back technique.Director and new actor both are arguementing with each other about which is good ...Theatre or Cinema.The father sacrifice his whole life for theatre and he wants to make his dream true by his son.But initially son agrees with him than he wants to leave the theatre because of thare is no fame , money and etc .So we can say that's why son goes to cinema.The one more thing is father try to convince his son by his struggle ,determination of life and also explain him that theatre is the basic thing for cinema.But yet son choose the field of cinema and becomes success.In the end Son comes back after long time where his father or Director live.They both share their feelings for that arguements and both are happy......So we can conclude that all things are good at it's own place.the another thing is here we sees is the relationship between coach and student how rudely he behaves with pupil but behind that he want to polish us.If we talk about technical aspect of the play it is very good play.There is use of light,myth like a Aswatthama's dialogue, shows the difference between cinema and theatre,difference between teacher and coach.Set is so simple.Costume also simple,good use of fed in -fed out technique.There is rising action , climax , falling action everything is there.One thing about the acting of the director in the play as a old man is missing.But yet it is very well play .If some one wants to learn the acting or how to do drama so this is the best play for them.
It was very good experience to see a live theatre play and it was my first live seen stage play.The name it self shows the greatness of the play.The main character of the play are Shrimad Rajchandraji (Guru of Mahatma Gandhi) and Mahatma Gandhi.Rajchandraji was a merchant .He had a very good virtue like memory power,multitasking, so many language knower,non -violence,truth,love ,kindness and etc.The play shows how he changed the Barrister life of M K Gandhi into Mahatma Gandhi. It is also an inspirational play .If we talk about technical aspect of play The title is appropriate, characters are like hero ,tragic scene also , and etc. Salute to the director and writer for this amazing idea....all actor acted very well ,they mesmerized us by their acting .I am sure his name and his thought will be "Raj" on us...It is worth to watch...Thanks...
